Can You Patent an Idea For Software?

Can you patent an idea for software? The answer to that question depends on the nature of your idea. If it involves a particular computing technology, you are likely to avoid the abstract idea classification. If, however, your idea involves an abstract concept, you can still seek a patent. Read on to learn more about what you need to do to protect your software idea. You can start by identifying whether your idea meets these criteria.

Abstract ideas

In a nutshell, patenting abstract ideas for software involves creating new ways to run computer programs. Whether the idea is a software program or a mathematical algorithm used in business practices, it must be “necessarily rooted” in computer technology, solve a problem, and have claims that do not preempt every use of the idea. This type of patent isn’t as straightforward as it sounds.

The Supreme Court recently clarified the rules for patenting software in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. The Alice case arose from a patentability issue involving software. The Alice case centered on a software patent that took an abstract idea and programmed it to run on a computer. Google and other technology companies closely followed the case and urged the court to make these rules more clear. Now, a more accurate understanding of these patent laws will be necessary to protect software inventors and companies.

Although the Federal Circuit ruling in Alice does not directly attack software patents, it does make it harder for patenting weak ideas for software. A mistake in describing or claiming an idea could doom an otherwise meritorious patent application. A knowledgeable patent attorney can keep this in mind and help you write a stronger application. For software, an experienced attorney will be able to make sure the idea is truly patentable. Further, he or she should be aware of the latest trends in 3D printing technology.

Several recent cases of software patenting have affirmed that the test for patenting abstract ideas is not confined to computer-implemented business methods or financial transactions. It even applies to network-controlled electric car charging stations and garage door openers. The case cited in Alice was a landmark decision on the issue. It is worth noting, however, that there is a long way to go before patenting software derived from abstract ideas.


Patent attorneys must consider non-obviousness when deciding whether an invention is patentable. This is a tricky concept that is often subject to interpretation and debate. An experienced patent attorney can help you determine whether your invention is truly novel. To begin with, it is necessary to identify the exact identity of your invention. This relates to whether the combination of prior art is obvious. The next step is to determine whether the combination is novel.

The tests for obviousness have been increasingly difficult to apply in recent years, with many layers of obscurity introduced. The Federal Trade Commission’s report on patent validity discourages retrospective analysis. Instead, the Federal Court requests a statement that ‘includes an inventive step’. This provides a framework for determining whether an invention is new or useful, and can be used to help determine whether an invention is obvious. Creating a hypothetical addressee with appropriate prior art and common knowledge is helpful in establishing a patent’s novelty and utility.

To be patentable, a new software innovation must not be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing. The standard of non-obviousness is not a simple one, but it is critical in determining whether a piece of software is truly innovative. An experienced patent practitioner can help you decide whether a software invention is novel and patentable. So how do you overcome non-obviousness when patenting software?

There are many ways to overcome the obviousness requirement in a patent application. First, the claimed invention must be useful. Second, it must not be obvious to combine a prior art item and an existing product. An example of a prior art combination would be combining an A B. A combination that does not work as anticipated would be obvious. That will be the most effective defense against an obviousness rejection.

Inventive step

There are three key steps in the process of assessing whether a software program is patentable. One is to establish that the software claim has an inventive step, which is a technical characteristic. The claim must go beyond ordinary interactions between a computer and its program. In some cases, the claimed solution may improve the efficiency of the manufacturing process or strengthen the security of the communication channel. Other times, the claim may protect the boot integrity of a computer.

While there are several important reasons for ensuring that the invention you submit for a patent has an ‘inventive’ step, the main one is to protect the inventor’s ideas. Patent rights protect individuals’ ideas that go beyond the obvious and allow them to make money from them. These rights are given to those who are able to prove that the new technology they created is better than what someone else has already created.

The next step in determining whether a software program is patentable is to establish a clear and convincing idea about how the product or method will be used. This is done by examining the patent claim’s claims and making sure they are based on an idea that is “abstractly obvious.” If an invention is “inherently obvious,” it must also be useful to the intended audience. A hypothetical computer program will not do this, so it is unlikely to be patentable.

Ultimately, patentability requires a solution to a problem. This can be achieved through a combination of technical knowledge and a review of existing literature. If an existing solution exists, it is not considered a valid invention. If the new solution is better, it will qualify as an “inventive step.”

Searching for existing patents

When you’re developing a new software or hardware product, search for existing patents to make sure your product is not already covered. This process has many advantages and benefits, depending on your company’s size, technology focus, and commercialization stage. Patent searches can help you expand your innovative concept and find new markets and revenue opportunities. They can also significantly reduce the costs of research and development. This allows for a faster time to market commercialization and a higher return on investment.

In addition to reducing costs, patent searching can help you perform landscape and patent mapping exercises. In addition, these tools can help you understand your competitive environment and provide insights into your competitors. A thorough search can reveal opportunities that you never even imagined existed. As long as you use a comprehensive patent database, you’ll have a solid foundation for your product development. And because patent searches can reveal new opportunities to your company, they’re well worth the time investment.

Before you start conducting your search, consider how far you can take it. You’ll be able to avoid redundancy. Patent searches help you determine whether or not your product idea has been patented before. Patents may also have been filed for similar software or hardware in other countries. The process can take weeks or even months, depending on how many patents you find. By conducting a patent search before starting your product development, you’ll be better equipped to protect your invention and stay on top of your competition.

You’ll also want to learn about free tools and strategies to help you locate existing patents. The USPTO website offers free patent information. Unlike other patent databases, the USPTO is easy to navigate and has a great Help Section to help you learn the ins and outs of patent searching. Another free site to explore is Free Patents Online. You’ll find a lot of information here for free.

Cost of a software patent

There are two parts to a software patent application. The first part is the prior art search, which can cost anywhere from $1,500 to $4,000. This step will identify published patent applications and similar issued patents. It can also reveal any barriers to registration. The results of the search can inform the next steps, as well as how much protection your software idea has already received. The attorney responsible for this step will charge a fee, and you will typically have to pay this amount to them.

While a software patent can be costly, it is worth it to protect your ideas against inappropriate use by competitors and position your company for better earnings. The cost of a software patent depends on how valuable it is to the company that owns the patent. For hobbyists, it may be worthwhile to apply for a provisional patent. A provisional patent application costs between $1,500 and $2,000. The cost of this type of application is typically less than $2,000 on UpCounsel.

Another component of the cost of a software patent is the time required for it to be approved. A software patent can take a decade to receive final approval. Using an experienced patent attorney can help you secure a license to your invention sooner. Similarly, a software patent can protect a business model or a user interface. If a software patent is issued, the software developer will get its full value sooner rather than later.

For a design patent, the total cost for preparing and filing the application can be less than $5,000. In addition to the USPTO filing fee of $330, there is a patent search fee of $540 and a lawyer’s fee of $200. After the first year, the patent is deemed provisional. After three years, the patent needs to be maintained by paying $980 for the maintenance fee. Maintenance fees vary depending on the structure of the patent and the entity applying for the patent.