Mergers and acquisitions can move fast. Decisions are made in boardrooms, valuations rise and fall overnight, and timelines rarely feel generous. But amid the rush, there’s one thing legal teams can’t afford to rush through — intellectual property due diligence.
It’s easy to focus on numbers, forecasts, and financial models. Those matter. But if the IP behind the product, brand, or service isn’t clean, protected, or properly assigned, the whole deal can start to unravel.
This article is your guide to making sure that doesn’t happen. Whether you’re representing the buyer or the seller, you need to dig deep into the company’s intellectual property — and not just check boxes, but truly understand what’s there, what’s missing, and what needs fixing.
We’ll walk you through the key areas to cover, the red flags to look out for, and how to manage the process with clarity and confidence. No jargon. No fluff. Just a real-world playbook built for legal teams who know what’s at stake.
Ready to get started?
Understanding What IP Really Means in a Deal
Why IP Isn’t Just Patents
When people hear “intellectual property,” they often jump straight to patents. But that’s just one slice of the pie. In most companies, IP includes trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, databases, software code, algorithms, designs, and even domain names.
These assets may not all be registered. Some may be buried in contracts or bundled into digital platforms. But they can carry just as much value — sometimes more — than the physical or financial assets being acquired.
In a world where ideas move faster than inventory, IP is often the key driver of a deal’s price and long-term promise.
Not All IP Is Visible
One of the first challenges for any legal team is uncovering what’s really there. IP doesn’t always live in a public registry. It might be sitting on a developer’s hard drive, written into training manuals, or wrapped up in customer databases.
Legal teams need to think beyond the obvious. It’s not just “what’s patented.” It’s “what’s been created,” “who created it,” and “how it’s been used or shared.”
That shift in mindset turns IP due diligence from a formality into a discovery process — and it often reveals strengths or risks the other side hadn’t seen.
The Stakes Are Higher Than They Look
Overlooking IP isn’t just a technical error. It can change the entire value of the deal. If rights haven’t been assigned properly, the buyer may end up with less than they paid for.
If trade secrets have leaked or if trademarks are weak, the buyer might inherit a mess instead of a moat. That can lead to disputes, drop in value, or even lawsuits after closing.
Legal teams have to treat IP due diligence not as a checklist but as a core part of risk analysis. It’s where deals are protected — or quietly unravel.
Key Ownership Questions That Must Be Answered
Who Really Owns the IP?
Start by verifying who legally owns the IP. This may sound simple, but it often isn’t.
Was the software built by employees or outside contractors? Were the inventors properly assigned to the company? Was the brand created before the company was formed?
Just because IP is being used by the target company doesn’t mean it legally belongs to them. That’s a crucial difference. And if ownership isn’t clear, that’s a red flag that needs fixing fast.
Are All Assignments in Place?
Go through employment and contractor agreements. Look for clear IP assignment language. Every person who created something valuable should have signed over their rights to the company.
If that paperwork doesn’t exist — or is vague — the buyer may not actually get what they think they’re buying. In that case, extra steps may be needed before closing.
Confirm whether there are any missing links in the chain of title. If the founder assigned a patent to a previous entity, or if a co-creator disappeared without signing off, that can cause serious headaches later.
Are There Third Parties With Claims?
Beyond employees and founders, ask whether any universities, partners, or investors could have rights to the IP.
Joint development agreements, incubator deals, or past licensing contracts might include shared ownership. That can restrict how the IP can be used or sold after the acquisition.
Understanding these outside influences is key — because buyers usually want full control. And hidden co-owners can block that path if they’re not addressed upfront.
Assessing Protection: What’s Filed, What’s Missing
Patent Status and Scope
Patents can be powerful — but only if they’re strong and properly filed.
Check each patent’s legal status. Is it granted, pending, or expired? Where is it filed — just in one country or globally? Does the patent cover the product’s key features, or just a narrow piece?
Weak or overly narrow patents can leave gaps in protection. And if they haven’t been maintained or renewed, they may not be enforceable.
Buyers need to know what’s enforceable, what’s defensible, and where they may need to file new protections fast.
Trademark Strength and Use
Trademarks tell a similar story. Is the brand registered? In which countries? Does the registration match the current way the name is used in marketing and packaging?
A strong trademark protects not just the logo, but the entire customer experience tied to the name.
Legal teams should also check for active oppositions, prior challenges, or abandoned applications. These could signal market confusion or unresolved legal risk.
Also consider whether the trademark covers future plans — like new product categories or markets the buyer wants to enter after the deal.
Copyright Ownership and Clarity
For creative content — like training guides, videos, websites, or software — copyrights matter.
Check whether the company owns these works directly or if they were licensed. Look for any contractor-created works without written assignments. Also confirm that third-party content used in websites or materials is licensed correctly.
This is often where IP due diligence falls short. People assume that if it’s on the company’s website, the company owns it. That’s not always true — and it can create infringement risk if ignored.
Trade Secret Handling
Some of the most valuable IP never gets registered at all. Trade secrets — like algorithms, customer lists, pricing models, or internal processes — depend on confidentiality.
Legal teams should ask how these are protected. Are NDAs in place with employees and vendors? Is access limited to only those who need it? Are there written policies in place?
If trade secrets have been poorly guarded, they may no longer be legally protected. And once they’re out, they’re gone forever.
This isn’t just about paperwork — it’s about actual behavior inside the company.
Reviewing IP Agreements and Their Hidden Impact
Licensing Agreements
Licensing is one of the trickiest areas in IP due diligence. A company might use IP that it doesn’t own but licenses from others. That’s not necessarily a problem — unless the license can’t be transferred.
Some agreements include non-transfer or change-of-control clauses. These prevent the buyer from using the licensed IP after the deal closes. If the target company relies on this IP to run its business, losing access could be disastrous.
Legal teams must find out which licenses are assignable, which are revocable, and which may need to be renegotiated as part of the deal.
Outbound Licensing and Revenue Streams
On the flip side, a company might license out its own IP to others. These deals can be a source of recurring revenue — but they come with baggage.
Some licenses might be too broad or last too long. Others might limit the company’s ability to pivot or compete in certain markets. Buyers want flexibility, not constraints.
Look closely at the terms. Can the license be canceled? Does it prevent exclusivity in key areas? Are there obligations to support or maintain the product?
Each license tells a story. And some of them could complicate your buyer’s plans if not fully understood in advance.
IP in Customer and Partner Contracts
IP language doesn’t just show up in licensing deals. It’s often buried in broader contracts — with customers, partners, vendors, and even resellers.
These contracts may include clauses about data ownership, co-created content, branding rights, or restrictions on use. For instance, a customer might have approval rights over product names, or a reseller might have long-term rights to certain marks.
These can limit what the buyer can do with the IP post-acquisition — especially if they want to scale, rebrand, or change business models.
Contracts should be reviewed not just for pricing or scope, but for how they affect control of the underlying intellectual property.
Analyzing Infringement Risks and Disputes
Past and Current Litigation
Every buyer wants to avoid a lawsuit landing on their desk the day after closing. That’s why legal teams need to investigate any IP litigation — past or present.
Check for lawsuits filed against or by the company. Look into the outcomes, ongoing obligations, or pending appeals. Were there settlements? Are there any restrictions or licenses that came from them?
Sometimes disputes aren’t in court but still carry weight. Cease-and-desist letters, mediation outcomes, or arbitration can all hint at friction that may resurface later.
Digging into these early lets buyers price in the risk — or steer clear entirely.
Freedom-to-Operate Reviews
Even if a company hasn’t been sued, that doesn’t mean it’s in the clear. If it’s using patented tech or brand names that belong to others, it might just be flying under the radar — for now.
Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis helps buyers understand whether the business can keep running without infringing someone else’s rights. This is especially key in industries like biotech, software, and consumer products.
An FTO check looks at whether the company’s offerings step on any existing patents or protected marks. It’s a precaution — and a smart one.
If the business is skating close to someone else’s rights, the buyer may need to plan for changes, licensing, or legal exposure down the line.
Open Source Compliance
In tech deals, open source software is another hot spot. Using open-source components is totally normal — but using them wrong can create major problems.
Some open-source licenses require the company to share its own code if it combines open and proprietary code. Others restrict commercial use altogether.
Buyers must confirm that open-source components are properly tracked, used under the right licenses, and not violating anyone’s terms.
If compliance isn’t clear — or if open-source code is deeply embedded in key products — the buyer might need to carve out time for remediation after closing.
Evaluating the Competitive Landscape Through IP
Market Position and Barriers
IP isn’t just legal — it’s strategic. It shows how strong the company’s position is in the market.
Buyers want to know: does this company have patents that block competitors? Does its brand dominate search results and shelf space? Are its secrets or algorithms hard to copy?
These are the real-world levers of value.
During diligence, legal teams can help translate IP filings into competitive insight. This helps the buyer see where the company has a moat — and where that moat might be shallow.
Pending Applications and Their Potential
Pending patents or trademarks often get less attention during diligence, but they can be a hidden goldmine — or a trap.
If granted, they might offer strong protection and create future value. But they could also be rejected or challenged. Their scope might shrink during examination. Their status could signal where the company wants to grow next.
Legal teams should review all pending applications and understand what they’re meant to protect, how likely they are to succeed, and whether any deadlines are approaching.
This analysis helps buyers decide whether to bet on the future value — or stick to what’s already granted and proven.
Competitor IP Pressure
Sometimes the target company isn’t being sued — but it’s in a crowded space where others are litigious.
Maybe big players in the market are quick to enforce their patents. Maybe rivals have filed trademark oppositions in the past.
Understanding the IP behavior of competitors can help assess future risk. If the buyer enters this market, will they get sued next?
Legal teams can map out competitor IP holdings and past enforcement activity. This isn’t just defensive — it can help shape how the buyer structures product development or branding after the deal.
Ensuring Assignment and Transfer of IP
Preparing Assignment Documents
One of the most essential — and sometimes most forgotten — steps in any M&A is the proper assignment of IP rights.
You can negotiate the perfect deal, pay the right price, and close the transaction. But if the IP is not legally assigned, the buyer doesn’t fully own it.
Assignment documents must be signed, dated, and in compliance with national and international IP office requirements. This is especially important with patents and trademarks, which usually require formal recorded assignments.
Legal teams should review all IP listed in the agreement and match each asset with a completed, filed assignment document. Without that, ownership is still in limbo.
Coordinating with National Registries
Each country has its own rules for recording assignments. Simply signing a document isn’t enough — it needs to be recorded in the proper registry to be enforceable.
That applies to USPTO filings in the United States, the EPO in Europe, and trademark offices around the world.
If the target company holds international rights, legal teams must prepare a transfer plan that includes deadlines, filing formats, translation needs, and government fees.
Some countries are strict. If you miss their formalities or timelines, the IP rights may not transfer — and enforcement becomes much harder later.
Handling Domain Names and Digital IP
Domain names, social media handles, and other digital identifiers aren’t always tied directly to formal IP — but they’re critical to brand continuity.
These need to be transferred too, often through registrar platforms or third-party providers. Buyers will want to take control of these as soon as possible to protect the brand.
This is also a good moment to confirm that domains are actually registered in the company’s name — not an employee’s or a third-party marketing firm’s.
The same applies to app store accounts, e-commerce pages, and code repositories. These may not be registered IP, but they carry value and need to move with the deal.
Planning for Future Use and Integration
Understanding Use Restrictions
After a deal closes, the buyer will want to use the IP — expand it, license it, rebrand it, or build on it.
But certain IP comes with use restrictions. These can be contractual, like licensing terms, or regulatory, like health-related IP that’s subject to FDA rules.
Legal teams should assess not just who owns the IP, but what can be done with it post-sale. Are there limitations on use, geography, product category, or time?
If those limits affect future plans, they must be factored into the buyer’s pricing and integration roadmap.
Aligning with the Buyer’s IP Portfolio
Some buyers are strategic acquirers who already hold large portfolios. For them, the question becomes: does this new IP fit into what we already own?
If the acquired IP overlaps or duplicates existing rights, it might have less value. If it fills a key gap, it may be worth more.
Legal teams should help map the acquired IP onto the buyer’s current portfolio. This helps identify areas of synergy, risk, or redundancy.
It also helps buyers decide what to keep, what to combine, and what to let go.
Setting Up Internal Controls
After the deal, the buyer becomes the new owner of the IP — but that also means they need to take responsibility for maintaining it.
This includes tracking renewal deadlines, filing future applications, managing licenses, and watching for infringement.
Legal teams must ensure that internal IP management systems are ready to absorb the new assets. That might mean integrating docketing tools, training staff, or hiring outside counsel.
Without a plan, assets can lapse. And that’s one of the easiest ways to lose value after a deal.
Preparing for IP Representations and Warranties
Making IP a Key Part of the Contract
The acquisition agreement will always include representations and warranties about IP. These are legal promises about what’s being delivered and the condition it’s in.
Buyers want strong warranties. They want to be sure the IP is valid, unencumbered, and doesn’t infringe others’ rights.
Sellers want to keep those promises narrow, to limit their liability. This is a major point of negotiation — and legal teams must make sure the language matches the facts.
Broad promises that aren’t backed by clean records create danger. So do vague disclaimers that don’t tell the buyer anything useful.
The best clauses are honest, specific, and supported by documentation.
Managing Risk Through Indemnities
If something goes wrong after the sale — like an IP lawsuit — the buyer may want compensation. That’s where indemnities come in.
Indemnity clauses say who pays if certain claims arise after closing. They’re especially common in deals where IP is the main asset or where there are known risks.
Legal teams should make sure these clauses are clear: what triggers them, how long they last, and how claims must be handled.
If the seller knows there’s a gray area — like a pending challenge or an open-source compliance issue — that should be addressed through carve-outs or special conditions.
Good indemnities don’t just assign blame. They provide a roadmap for resolution.
Using Escrow to Cover Uncertainties
Sometimes, buyers aren’t sure whether a risk will become real. But they don’t want to walk away from the deal.
In those cases, part of the purchase price may be held in escrow — a temporary account managed by a third party. If no issues arise after a set period, the money is released to the seller.
Escrow can be used to cover unknown IP risks, like ongoing litigation or unresolved ownership questions.
It’s not always ideal for the seller, but it can help get the deal done. Legal teams should help structure escrow in a way that’s fair, clear, and time-bound.
Communicating IP Insights to the Deal Team
Translating Legal Terms into Business Impact
Legal teams are deep in the weeds during IP diligence. They read contracts, analyze filings, and decode licensing structures. But at some point, all of that information needs to be shared with the dealmakers — clearly and quickly.
It’s not enough to say “the patent is enforceable” or “the trademark is valid.” What the rest of the team needs to hear is how that affects the deal.
Does the IP add exclusivity that justifies a higher price? Does it present a risk that may affect timing or structure? Is there a gap that could limit market expansion after the deal?
When legal teams present findings in business terms, they give decision-makers the tools to adjust strategy in real time.
Flagging Red, Yellow, and Green Zones
One simple framework that helps deal teams digest IP findings is categorizing issues by risk level.
Green means everything’s in order — ownership is clean, filings are current, and no litigation exists.
Yellow means there’s a risk — but it can be managed, fixed, or priced into the deal.
Red means a serious threat — like missing assignments, pending litigation, or use restrictions that can’t be worked around.
This color-coded approach lets business leaders know where to focus. It also helps everyone align on what to fix before closing and what to watch afterward.
Keeping Timing in Sync
IP issues can affect timelines. If a patent filing is due next month, or if a licensing agreement needs to be renegotiated before transfer, that changes the schedule.
Legal teams should stay closely synced with corporate development teams and external advisors. If IP diligence is slower than expected, that has to be flagged early.
No deal team wants to scramble at the last minute — or worse, close a deal without resolving known issues.
Clear updates, delivered in plain language, keep everyone moving in the same direction.
Special Considerations in Cross-Border Deals
International Ownership and Filings
Global deals raise global IP questions. A patent may be valid in one country, but offer zero protection in another. A trademark might exist in the U.S., but not in Asia or Europe.
Buyers must confirm where IP is registered, where it’s enforceable, and where new filings may be needed post-acquisition.
This includes reviewing WIPO filings, PCT applications, and national office records — depending on where the target company operates or plans to expand.
Legal teams should bring in local counsel when needed. Small differences in procedure can have a big effect on ownership or enforceability.
Language and Translation Issues
Legal meaning can shift in translation. If you’re reviewing contracts in multiple languages, be careful. Terms around exclusivity, duration, or royalty scope may be phrased differently — or carry different legal weight — depending on the jurisdiction.
Don’t rely on rough or automated translations. Hire certified translators and have local legal experts review the materials.
This is especially true for older contracts, where language may not be aligned with modern IP practices.
When the wording is unclear, the buyer may be left exposed to obligations they didn’t intend to accept.
Export Controls and Compliance
Some types of IP — particularly in sectors like defense, biotech, or encryption software — are subject to export control laws.
These laws may limit how the IP can be shared across borders, even after an acquisition.
If a U.S. company acquires foreign-owned IP, or vice versa, it may need special approvals to use or transfer certain technologies.
Legal teams must check whether the IP is regulated under frameworks like ITAR, EAR, or similar local laws.
Ignoring these rules can lead to heavy fines, lost rights, or even a blocked transaction.
Post-Closing Responsibilities and Follow-Up
Finalizing IP Transfers
Once the deal is closed, the real work begins. Recorded assignments must be filed. Trademark changes need to be registered. Systems must be updated.
This is where deals can fall apart in practice — not legally, but operationally.
Legal teams should have a post-closing IP checklist ready to go. This includes tasks like:
- Filing assignments with patent and trademark offices
- Updating WHOIS records for domain names
- Notifying licensors or licensees of the ownership change
- Scheduling maintenance fee payments and renewal deadlines
Many of these items are time-sensitive. If they’re delayed, IP rights may lapse or become unenforceable.
Integrating IP into the Buyer’s Systems
The buyer’s legal and IP teams must also make room for the new assets. That includes adding them to the company’s portfolio management systems, centralizing records, and aligning ongoing strategies.
If the acquired company used different legal counsel, formats, or filing systems, some cleanup may be needed. Disorganization here can lead to missed deadlines or conflicting rights later.
A clean integration plan ensures that the IP starts working for the buyer right away — not six months later.
Monitoring and Enforcing New Rights
Once the IP is transferred, the buyer becomes responsible for protecting it.
This includes watching the market for infringement, responding to violations, and continuing or renegotiating any existing enforcement actions.
Buyers should assess which rights need active monitoring — such as trademarks in competitive categories — and which can be held quietly for strategic use later.
In some industries, enforcing IP is as important as owning it. A strong enforcement policy protects long-term value and helps the buyer realize the full return on their investment.
Closing Thoughts: IP Due Diligence Is Strategy in Disguise
IP due diligence may seem like a legal formality. But in truth, it’s one of the sharpest strategy tools in any M&A deal.
It reveals what the company truly owns. It shows whether ideas are protected, how value is delivered, and what competitive edge the buyer is really getting.
Handled correctly, it protects the deal, speeds up integration, and prevents surprises. Handled poorly, it can create years of legal and financial headaches.
For legal teams, this isn’t just about redlining documents or scanning patent databases. It’s about asking better questions. Looking around corners. And understanding that behind every patent, mark, or contract, there’s a business model waiting to be either strengthened — or shaken.
IP is not just paperwork. It’s power. And diligence is how you make sure you’re actually buying it.
